Yesterday's post garnered a lot of discussion, via facebook, and other various feeds and locations.
On my friend Sylvia's "wall" we got into a long discussion about
Harry Potter,
Philip Pullman
, and adults self-censoring. This was a bit beside the point of the article, but interesting nonetheless. I am a fan of
Harry Potter
, and, while I find some things rather troubling (Harry uses repeatedly an "unforgivable" curse. Why does this not matter?), I would not shy away from reading them with my kids--and discussing them. It has been a long time since I have read any of Pullman's works, so I cannot say that I'd let my kids read them, but I certainly would not shy away from them as an adult educated and secure in her faith.
Mills argued that the popularity of these books is a good sign for Young Adult Literature:
This suggests that not every child is satisfied with the self-centered, unheroic stories to be found in the young adult section. They are more realistic and more interested in reality—of “real reality,” if you will—than the makers of the “real life” books realize.
I'd count it as a mixed sign. While what he says above is certainly true, I think its pretty lame if the best we can do for young adult fiction is
Harry Potter or Philip Pullman.
Interestingly, there is a new trend in young adult fiction that blends the sharp "reality" of most teen fiction with a fantasy. Post-apocalyptic dystopian teen fiction has both the uber-realistic emotional territory of a teenager's heart and a rebellious fantasy, which teenagers love to explore. (For more about these books check out the
fascinating article in
The New Yorker).
My friend Amanda (a librarian) had these comments, whch she kindly allowed me to post here on the blog (as she has much more experience with this field than I do, though, clearly, I need to change that!):
I have never been naturally drawn to that type of "realistic fiction"; as my sister and I have often said, only somewhat jokingly, the main characters in these books often seem to go through every bad thing imaginable rolled into one--familial abuse, rape, discrimination, drugs, abortion--and is that REALLY a realistic depiction of the average teenage reader of the story?
I also read a ton of kids and young adult books, for personal interest as well as to vet possible recommendations as a librarian, and there are so many books, especially for teens, that as he said, you can find some value in and I may even enjoy, but to be honest I can't in good conscience recommend to a teen. At best I can recommend it to a fellow adult with reservations. I also like his nod to the greater themes present in Harry Potter
and The Golden Compass
, despite some reservations with the latter. I think that's why I've always been drawn to fantasy; even at its most simplistic it deals with greater themes of good and evil rather than simply the self. I think that's also why I have a new found fascination with post-apocalyptic dystopian teen fiction. Again, the characters are placed in situations where the norm of apathy and selfishness just aren't going to cut it anymore, and as an excellent article my sister posted on my wall about this genre a little while ago points out, what makes teen dystopian fiction different than most adults is that some sort of hope is presented--in order to do that, the main characters have to move beyond selfishness and simple survival mode to work together for a greater good.
I'd also like to expand Miss Chamber's excellent observation in the
comments section yesterday. She notes that teachers are being encouraged to have their teenage students read these books, because they represent what real teenagers are feeling. But I can't imagine (as a recovering teenager myself) wanting to encourage the self-obsessed worldview of a teenager by giving them these books.
I am glad to say I never experienced this, as I was reading "adult" books by the time I was in junior high (and even a few when I was in middle school). Our highschool literature curriculum had everything from Socrates and Homer to Ambrose Bierce to Austen to Samuel Taylor Coleridge to Graham Greene (though our teacher got in a little trouble for that one).
I always count among the biggest blessings and gifts from my parents was to travel when I was in Highschool. As a teenager I went to London, to Rome and Paris, and to Quebec City. While I obviously loved all those places, they had the most influence on me simply by assuring me that the world is bigger than my home town, and filled with fascinating things. When a teenager's natural inclination is to be self-absorbed, and think that highschool IS THE CENTER OF THE WORLD, then the most important and educative thing one can do for a them is broaden their worldview. And if you can't travel, at least you can read.